24 Nov 2009

Light sentences for benefit frauds

When submitting her benefit claims, Pauline Rothwell from Abergele failed to declare that she and her husband owned a second property in Manchester worth over £100,000 and had rented it out for a total of £12,000 ... by way of Housing Benefit from Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council.

She was overpaid Income Support, Pension Credit and Council Tax Benefit amounting to £6,601 from July 2003 to February 2007. And the punishment? She was fined £495 and ordered to pay costs of £585.

Jeanette Barrett, from Bromsgrove, failed to give prompt written notification of a change of circumstances, namely that she was working whilst claiming Housing and Council Tax Benefit. This resulted in an overpayment of Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit, totalling £2,635.

And her punishment? She was sentenced by Redditch Magistrates to a compensation order stating that she needs to repay £1,000 over a two-year period, paying £100 that day, followed by £10 per week, via a fines collection order.
  • These people do it for the money. So hit them in the pocket. It was money that motivated them, and a financial penalty will help to deter them.

    People convicted of benefit fraud who don't receive a custodial sentence should have to do unpaid work.

    Benefit thieves should also have to repay twice what they've stolen, and should not be eligible for any further benefits – including tax credits - until they have. A confiscation order should be automatic and immediate.

    If you don't punish people who are convicted of an easy crime, the offence will continue to look attractive.

3 comments:

Eamon Dillon said...

A lot of benefit fraud in the UK and Ireland are small time epople but there has been a few well-organised gangs who make a living out of it. One of then is the Maughan family, Irish travellers who live near Bristol. You might be interested in having a quick look:

http://www.dilloninvestigates.com/index_files/2009/04/welfare-fraud.html

John Page said...

Thanks, Eamon, I did, do you have references for the original news report?

Oldchimer said...

John could I suggest that you have a look at the Magistrates Guilines on SEntencing, new ones recently issued. I think then you will see that the Magistrates are not at fault. I have investigated Benefit FRaudsters for 25 years and have been prosecuting them for the past 7 years, I can tell you from experience that the sentences are getting stiffer.